Release: (2008)
Runtime: 95 Minutes
Starring: Dennis Quaid, Sarah Jessica Parker, Ellen Page and Thomas Haden Church
I didn’t like Juno and I didn’t like this. It wasn’t horrible, but I would not watch it again and there were a couple points where I was ready to stop it and finish later. I’m going to be blunt and a lot of people will disagree, but I feel like these films are trying to capitalize on the indie flick feel without being indie flicks.
First off, with a budget of $7 Million, you are pretty much out of the indie flick range. Its not big budget, but its not the idealized “guys with a camera using friends and connections with credit card financing.” I bet most of that money went to paying the actors, which is the biggest waste, because none of them really come through in any way. Ellen Page is not a good actress, she can play a sarcastic young Janeane Garofalo and that is it. Even when cast as someone entirely different, she does the same thing. I like Haden Chruch in a lot of his roles and he did a fine job in this, but that was not enough to carry it. I still don’t understand why Parker’s character was even in the film, it was so forced and pointless that I won’t say more. Quaid had a lot of weight on his shoulder and I felt he did alright, but nothing stunning. He played a smart self-absorbed ass and I just didn’t believe anything other than the ass part.
Now the nitty-gritty. It was written to be set at Georgetown, see Quaid’s character is a teacher, it was filmed at CMU in Pittsburgh. They said in the Bonus Features that was because they liked the feel of the campus. They also liked that CMU was mainly a technical school where a stunning English professor wouldn’t typically be. I spent four years at a school about half an hour from CMU. My school didn’t have any entertainment come to campus so on most weekends we would go down there. They would have big bands like the Shins, Broken Social Scene and Mono play there. I also competed there in Cross Country, Track, Water Polo and Business Plans. Google it. I know that campus and I know Pittsburgh. So here is where I got mad, they said in interviews the movie had a real Pittsburgh feel because they wanted to get away from the typically New York setting. It didn’t. Other than two or three shots of the campus, a few in a classroom or dorm and the shots of the outside of the house, nothing was Pittsburgh or CMU. It is as if they picked a location based on budget restraints, and then attempted to use that as a quirky element to the film. That disgusts me. With the amount of driving in the film, someone should have said, “let me ride you to school,” at which every non-Pittsburger would have been confused and the movie would have captured the feel of the city. Even if you argue these are educated people that speak proper, you leave out all other possible and less obvious ambiance.
So for the message part I’ll say this. Its smart people with little emotional intelligence that have to deal with life issues. The problem is the film does not have well developed story arches that flow properly and because of that it just seems like a big stuck up mess. Plus, it was advertised as a comedy, which it is not. That might just be bad marketing, but nonetheless, a huge flaw in building anticipation.
Please, don’t supoort this or films like it, so indie can go back to being indie and we can get some good classics again.
Accessibility: 5
Technique: 4
Thought Provoking: 3
Originality: 6
Entertainment: 3



IMDB
IMDB